doesn't want to get on a chat and talk to somebody else on weather, literature,
football etc. ? But the chat as free talk place sometimes presents some
we rely on the common sense of every participant in a conversation. Due
to the inherent freedom, especially from a technical point of view, some
of us free themselves from social constraints, be they imposed or not,
and they obviously cause displeasure or worse, they temporarily destroy
don't want to press charges here but only to try to bring a few issues
to your attention.
- COMMON VOCABULARY. Not everybody is in the mood to "listen"
to certain words. An ideal method would be to split people in separate
rooms where a certain gradation would be observed, up to - why not?
- licentiousness. One can't limit or create a chat program clever enough
to detect such language. There have been made attempts at making dictionaries.
Success is not at the expectation level and sometimes you cannot write
well as your legs have got jelly :))). A key to allow you to wipe away
the disturbing character would be salutary.
- TESTS. A piece of advice: Don't stuff your chat conversations by "test".
It's hell, especially when you want to follow a discussion. Even other
forms of test (counting, spelling) are not solutions. You may drop a
joke if you've lost your patience. If you've used two jokes and still
no results appear, then you should give up the chat for a time. Nobody
is obliged to bear inpatient people.
- CRITICS. Boring chat. What a lack of topics. Gentlemen, we're not
at a party meeting. There is nothing more embarrassing than these remarks.
They prove besides lack of tolerance a certain dryness of the spirit.
Who doesn't want to take part is not forced to stay.
- REPETITIONS. Nagging sometimes, sometimes full of humor, repetitions
are also a way of loading the chat, often uselessly. Ignore them if
there is no moderation or accept them with stoicism. The person who
repeats things might look for something. If it's clearly there is only
meanness in this, the person with certain attributes on the chat should
eliminate him or her. To the extreme, even an IPs class.
- ELIMINATION. Normally, there should be a moderator who does not participate
in conversation. Unfortunately, such a character should be paid and
he (she) should have enough culture and diplomacy. To settle a dispute
one should have these two attributes. In addition, he (she) should have
a map of the IPs to be able to spare the innocent of elimination. Collective
punishments are inconceivable. Moreover, the moderator must protect
the site against haeckers.Cato